Creative AI / interactive web application / experimental content · Portfolio example
Jobu Tupaki: Interactive Story Generator
A playful web application turns a seed, a strange rule and a mood into an alternate-universe story prompt.
Work directly with Brian Bateman in Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Serving businesses locally and nationwide.
A playground for possible worlds
Jobu Tupaki turns a small what-if question into an invitation to explore consequences. DOYJO built the current interface around a single prompt, a choice of tone and a clear action to explore the proposed universe.
The dark visual identity, orbital illustration and concise copy make the premise visible before a visitor begins. A sample about free city buses demonstrates the kind of everyday change the experience can explore.
Current website view
The current interface presents the what-if prompt directly beneath the introduction, with grounded, playful and more imaginative tone choices. This replaces the earlier dispatch-oriented presentation in the portfolio.
A quicker starting point for creative exploration
We improved initial asset delivery and supplied the site icon while retaining the prompt and exploration workflow. The current tests measure the public first view.
The current phone experience
On a phone, the opening message leads into the prompt field in one vertical flow. The heading, supporting explanation and instruction to start below give the interaction a clear beginning.
DOYJO’s work focuses on a small number of decisions: what changes, how to frame the exploration and when to generate a response. The visual system supports that playful purpose without requiring a visitor to learn a complicated interface.
The capture shows the prompt interface before submission. It does not contain a generated answer or establish the accuracy of hypothetical outcomes. The product presents an exploratory experience rather than a forecast.
Current view captured October 16, 2026 in Chrome Incognito with DevTools mobile emulation at 390 by 844 CSS pixels.
Current Lighthouse evidence
We tested the current website after the October 16 optimization work. Lighthouse 13.5.0 ran in fresh Chrome Incognito sessions with extensions disabled. The screenshots and scores below come from the same recorded runs.
These are dated lab measurements. They help identify loading and technical issues; they do not establish rankings, revenue, real-user performance or complete accessibility. Results can vary with network conditions and third-party services.
Mobile Lighthouse results
October 16, 2026 · after optimization
- Performance
- 91
- Accessibility
- 100
- Best Practices
- 100
- SEO
- 100
Completed without a Lighthouse run warning.
First contentful paint: 2.8 s. Largest contentful paint: 2.8 s. Blocking time: 0 ms. Layout shift: 0.
Moto G Power emulation with simulated Slow 4G and CPU slowdown. Audit timestamp: 2026-10-17T02:39:59.844Z. Local review date: October 16, 2026, America/Chicago.
Desktop Lighthouse results
October 16, 2026 · after optimization
- Performance
- 99
- Accessibility
- 100
- Best Practices
- 100
- SEO
- 100
Completed without a Lighthouse run warning.
First contentful paint: 0.7 s. Largest contentful paint: 0.7 s. Blocking time: 0 ms. Layout shift: 0.002.
Desktop preset with simulated network conditions. Audit timestamp: 2026-10-17T02:40:11.812Z. Local review date: October 16, 2026, America/Chicago.
Your next step
Let’s talk about your project.
Interested in an approach like this? Tell Brian about your business, the part of this example that interests you and what you want to improve.